Received: from UKACRL.BITNET by UICVM (Mailer R2.07) with BSMTP id 9990; Sun, 18 Nov 90 08:01:28 CST Received: from RL.IB by UKACRL.BITNET (Mailer R2.07) with BSMTP id 1104; Sun, 18 Nov 90 12:24:39 GMT Received: from RL.IB by UK.AC.RL.IB (Mailer R2.03B) with BSMTP id 2699; Sun, 18 Nov 90 12:24:39 GMT Via: UK.AC.GLA.ART.SUN1; 18 NOV 90 12:24:33 GMT From: Dan Greenstein Date: Sun, 18 Nov 90 12:24:18 GMT Message-Id: <2966.9011181224@dumbo.sun1.arts.glasgow.ac.uk> To: U35395@UICVM Subject: Re: addresses? please ack michael, sorry to have taken so long to reply properly to your last message. term has really gotten on top of me. had to write four lectures from scratch last week and five for this (frankly i thought four was the absolute limit, but this has clearly become an endurance test...) anyway, the wg includes the following: Daniel Greenstein, Modern History Dept, Glasgow University, Glasgow, G12 8QQ Peter Denley, Queen Mary and Westfield College, Hampstead Campus, Kidderpore Ave, London, NW3 7ST Kevin Schurer, Cambridge Group for the History of Population and Social Studies, 27 Trumpington Street, Cambridge CB2 1QA Donald Spaeth, Centre for Teaching in Computing and History = CTICH, Glasgow University, Glasgow, G12 8QQ That makes up the Brit contingent with the possible exception of Peter Wakelin who said he would look at Port books. He has recently changed jobs and i haven't yet got his address (lou is particularly keen to see him involved in wg) Hans-Jorgens Marker, Danish Data Archive, Odense University, Campusweg, 55, 5230 Odense M Caroline Broulet, IRHT, 40 Avenue D'iena, 75116, Paris, France Jan Oldervoll, ISV, University of Tromso, Boks, 1040, 9001, Tromso, Norway Manfred Thaller (whose address you surely must have) but if not, I use Max Planck Institut fur Geschichte, Gottingen, Germany Ingo Kropac, Forschungsinstitut fur Historische Grundwissenschafte Universite de Graz, Heinrichstrasse 26-III, 8010 Graz, Austria I have not gotten the letter (but than haven't checked Oxford post in some weeks, so if it went there I won't have seen it), but did get a copy of the rules for WGs. Have sent this letter along with the application which I submitted to the TEI in Sept to members of the WG and outlined for them a plan of action very much along the lines suggested through the guidelines for wgs and through discussion with lou. with any luck, all will agree to submit draft reports on TEI guidelines with a view to their particular areas of expertise and the documents etc that crop up therein. Such reports should reach me by 31 Jan 1991. Thereafter, Kevin Schurer (who has already conducted quite extensive work in this field with respect to standardizing mark up of census and census like data) and I will meet and dry to cobble together either a draft report (Based on the submissions), or at least an agenda based on our reading of the submissions for a meeting to be held sometime near the end of March. This report and/agenda will be circulated to the committee members along with all their draft reports. Have only mailed out this proposed strategy a week or so ago (by traditional post, I'm afraid) and am waiting to hear back from colleagues. Will let you know more as soon as I know more. ps - could you pass this message along to your colleague with whom i have been in touch. hope all is well in the windy city. go shopping at marshall fields this xmas and admire the window displays set up there with the help of my sister. dig